Why Children from the USSR Were More Independent: Three Parenting Principles We Lost

A seven-year-old child walks to school alone across the entire district. A ten-year-old prepares dinner for younger siblings. A twelve-year-old travels to the countryside by train to visit grandmother. This was normal in the USSR. Today, it's an unthinkable picture that would earn condemnation from everyone around.

Modern children at sixteen don't know how to fry an egg. They can't register for a doctor's appointment themselves. They're afraid to ask strangers for directions. Parents drive them to school until graduation, solve all their problems, and control every step. This is called "hyper-parenting." But it used to be different. Let's explore which parenting principles made Soviet children independent — and why we gave them up.

Main points from the article:

• Soviet children gained independence and responsibility early without micromanagement;
• Parents didn't solve all problems for children, teaching them to handle things on their own;
• Childhood environments without constant adult presence fostered social skills;
• Modern hyper-parenting deprives children of learning from mistakes;
• Safety is higher today than in the USSR, but fear is greater due to media influence;
• Balance between protection and freedom is key to raising independent children.

First Principle: Trust Without Total Control

In the USSR, parents let children go out with simple words like "be home for dinner" or "come back by dusk." No hourly calls, geolocation, or text messages every half hour. The child went out and was left to their own devices.

Five-year-olds played in the yard without supervision. Eight-year-olds went to the store for bread and milk. Ten-year-olds rode bikes all over the district. This wasn't considered parental negligence — it was ordinary life.

Why It Worked:

The courtyards were safer not because crime was rare (it wasn't), but because everyone looked out for the children. Grandmothers on benches, neighbors in windows, janitors, passersby. Strangers could scold a child, take them home, or tell parents about it. The principle of collective responsibility worked.

Children learned to assess risks on their own. Without parents nearby, they had to think: should I go to the construction site, jump over the fence, or fight with bullies? Mistakes were made, bruises and scrapes too. But this developed decision-making skills.

Trust fostered responsibility. When you're trusted, you don't want to disappoint. If told to be home for dinner, you watch the time. Responsibility comes not from lectures but from practice.

What We Lost:

Today, a child alone on the street is seen as an emergency. Strangers call the police. Neighbors judge. Parents may be accused of negligence. Fear of losing a child, fear of judgment, fear that something might happen paralyzes.

Children grow under total control. Geolocation on phones, cameras in the yard, escorting to and from school. The result is that they don't learn independence because there's no opportunity.

Second Principle: Solve Your Own Problems

Conflict with a classmate? Sort it out yourself. Forgot your notebook? That's your problem. Got a bad grade? Answer before the teacher. Soviet parents didn’t rush to school to solve every issue.

This doesn't mean they were indifferent. But there was a clear boundary: your matters — your responsibility. Adults only intervened in extreme cases: serious fights, threats to health, unfair treatment by teachers.

How It Built Independence:

The child learned to negotiate. If they had a fight with a friend, they had to make peace themselves. Ask for forgiveness, find a compromise, defend their position. Parents weren’t lawyers or negotiators.

Mistakes had consequences. Forgot your PE uniform? You stood in gym class. Didn’t do homework? You got a bad grade. Didn't tidy your room? You lived in chaos. Cause and effect worked directly, without a safety net.

Internal motivation emerged. When parents don’t hover over homework, and grades are your problem, either you organize yourself or get bad marks. Many chose the first.

What Changed:

Modern parents solve everything for children. Forgot your PE uniform? Mom rushes to bring it. Conflict with a classmate? Dad goes to the principal. Bad grade? Parents write an angry letter to the teacher.

Children don’t learn to handle difficulties. Why bother if parents solve everything? Learned helplessness develops: when you face a problem, call mom.

Infantilization lasts until adulthood. Students who had parents solve everything in school can’t pass exams alone. Twenty-year-olds don't know how to register for a doctor's appointment without mom’s help.

Third Principle: Child Environment Without Adults

Soviet children spent a lot of time in their environment: the yard, clubs, pioneer camps. Adults were somewhere on the periphery. They didn't supervise every game, intervene in conflicts, or organize free time minute by minute.

In the yard, children created games themselves, made rules, and chose friends. Hierarchy formed naturally. Leaders, followers, outsiders — it was a child’s social laboratory.

What the Child Environment Taught:

Socialization in real life. How to negotiate, defend your opinion, resolve conflicts, find compromises. These skills can’t be learned from books or lectures — only through practice.

Self-organization. No one made game schedules, appointed team captains, or monitored fairness. Children decided what to play, how to divide roles, who was right and wrong.

Dealing with setbacks. If hurt, learn to respond or ignore it. Not chosen for a game? Find another group or prove you’re worthy. Without adults who would run to complain and punish the bullies.

Modern Reality:

Children are almost never without adults. In the yard — parents on benches. On playgrounds — moms watching every move. In clubs — coaches and parents. At home — under supervision.

Games are organized by adults. Animators, development centers, clubs with strict schedules. Spontaneous child activity is rare. Everything is structured and controlled.

Conflicts are resolved by adults. Two kids fight in the sandbox — moms jump in to mediate and reconcile. Children don’t get a chance to sort it out themselves. They don't learn negotiation.

Why the Regression Happened

The Soviet parenting model wasn't perfect. It had its own issues: authoritarianism, collective pressure, cruelty in the child environment, apathy towards bullying. But it did foster independence.

Today’s pendulum swung in the opposite direction. Reasons:

• Changed Information Environment. News are full of stories about kidnappings, violence, tragedies with children. Though statistics show the world is safer, perception is opposite. Fear paralyzes.
• Fewer Children in Families. In the USSR, there were two or three children. Now often just one. All fears and expectations are projected onto the only child. Losing him is unthinkable. Hence, hyper-parenting.
• Changed Role of the Parent. Before, parents were authorities, educators — sometimes distant. Now they are friends, partners involved in every aspect of the child’s life. The line between childhood and adulthood is blurred.
• Competition and Anxiety. Modern society demands success. Parents fear that if they let go, the child won’t get into a good university, find work, or succeed. Hence, control over schoolwork, clubs, every minute.
• Loss of Social Support. In the USSR there were courtyards, neighbors, collectives. Now families are atomized. No grandmothers on benches, no neighbors to watch over. Parents face the child alone.

The Cost of Hyper-Parenting

Constant control and solving all problems for the child seems caring. But the cost is high.

• Anxiety. Children constantly protected grow anxious. They absorb: the world is dangerous, I can't handle it alone, without parents I'll disappear. This forms the basis for anxiety disorders in adulthood.
• Low Self-Esteem. When parents solve everything for you, subconsciously you think: “I’m not capable on my own.” Hence, insecurity, fear of mistakes, avoidance of challenges.
• Missing Skills. Can't cook, do laundry, manage time, solve daily problems. At university or when moving out, a collapse occurs.
• Infantilization. Adults aged 25–30 still live with parents, can't make decisions, wait for someone to solve things. This is a product of hyper-parenting.
• Generational Conflict. When the child grows and wants autonomy, parents can't let go. Conflicts start, resentment builds, relationships break.

What to Take from the Soviet Experience

We can’t return to the USSR, but some principles should be reconsidered.

• Give Responsibility by Age. A five-year-old can tidy toys. A seven-year-old can make a bed. A ten-year-old can prepare a simple breakfast. A twelve-year-old can go to the store. A sixteen-year-old can manage their time.
• Don't Solve All Problems for the Child. Forgot your notebook? Let them explain to the teacher. Fought with a friend? Let them learn to reconcile. Got a bad grade? Let them think about how to fix it. Parents are advisors, not rescuers.
• Let Them Go in Controlled Conditions. Start small: send them to the store around the corner, let them walk in the yard for half an hour, give a task in town. Gradually expand boundaries.
• Teach Dealing with Failure. Don’t scold for mistakes, don’t rescue from consequences. Discuss: what went wrong, how to do differently, what lesson to learn. Mistakes are normal.
• Create a Child Environment. Clubs, sections, camps where children interact without constant parental presence. Let them play with friends without control.
• Trust. This is the hardest. Let go of fear, believe they can handle it. Trust builds responsibility better than any lecture.

Balance Between Safety and Freedom

The modern world is different. Sending a seven-year-old alone through town — irresponsible. But keeping a sixteen-year-old under total control — also not the answer.

• Balance is needed. Consider age, circumstances, child’s skills. Don’t blindly copy the Soviet model, but don't smother with hyper-parenting either. Ask yourself: am I protecting the child from real danger or my own fear? Often it’s the latter.
• Teach skills, then let go. First go to the store together, show how to choose, pay, check change. Then let them go alone. First walk to school together, then part of the way, then leave them.
• Talk About Risks. Don’t scare, explain. Not “it’s dangerous there — don’t go,” but “these are situations when you should be careful, and here’s how to act.”

Children from the USSR were more independent not because times were better. But because they were given the chance to be independent. They were trusted, not solved for, allowed into a child environment. We lost these principles out of fear and hyper-control. But we can find a new balance: protect but don’t suffocate, help but not do for them, trust but teach skills. Independence doesn't emerge at eighteen. It is cultivated over years — small steps of freedom and responsibility.

Front cover from freepik.com